by naternet December 4, 2011
Well, That Happened 2011 - BCS Edition

So it’s a rematch. 

Never mind that Alabama already lost to LSU. 

Never mind that Alabama didn’t win their division.

Never mind that Alabama didn’t play in their conference title game. 

Never mind that only three of Alabama’s wins came against teams that ended the season with a winning record. 

Never mind that Oklahoma State beat seven teams who ended the season with a winning record.

Never mind that there are 119 other teams in the FBS. Some of them even deserving of a shot at the national title, despite not being named Alabama.

Never mind that, in five of the seven computer rankings, Oklahoma State was #2. It was the human voters who found it necessary to keep the ‘Pokes at #3, despite the ass-whipping they handed to #10 Oklahoma. What highly ranked team did Alabama beat this week? Oh yeah, that’s right, they didn’t play anyone. They were eliminated from their own conference title game. Curious…

Despite all of those factors, it’s going to be LSU v. Alabama in New Orleans on January 9th. Oklahoma State is going to have to settle for Stanford in the Fiesta Bowl. Andrew Luck doesn’t have the horses to outscore the Cowboys and Stanford’s defense isn’t fast enough to stay with Brandon Weeden and Justin Blackmon and Joseph Randle. 

So, where are we if Alabama beats LSU close in January? They would end the season 1-1 head to head. Do they share the national title? If Okie State blows the doors off Stanford, do they have a claim at the title? Is there any way I can talk myself into not hating this matchup? Probably not. Let’s stop talking about it.

Giving a cursory look at the remainder of the bowl schedule, here are some big questions I have:

1. Arkansas State v. Northern Illinois in the GoDaddy dot com Bowl is going to be a fun matchup. Lots of points and excitement.

2. UCLA v. Illinois in the Kraft Fight Hunger Bowl is the exact opposite of fun and exciting. In fact, it’s the poster child for those who complain that there are too many bowl games. Neither of these teams deserves to play another game and we certainly don’t deserve to suffer through it. 

3. Wisconsin v. Oregon in the Rose Bowl should be a very good game. Two well-rounded teams that are well-coached. Great matchup.

4. Ohio State v. Florida in the Gator Bowl is an abomination. Heaven help the poor souls who attend/watch this one.

5. Texas A&M has no business playing in a bowl. For that matter the following teams should not have received bowl bids at all, in my opinion - Texas A&M, UCLA, Florida, Illinois, Mississippi State.

6. TCU and Boise State are going to make mincemeat of their opponents, Louisiana Tech and Arizona State, respectively. 

7. Washington v. Baylor in the Alamo Bowl could be a very interesting undercard bowl game. If Keith Price and Chris Polk can keep up with RGIII and the Baylor offense, that is.

8. Not bowl-related, but Robert Griffin III deserves the Heisman. If I had a ballot, it would read - RGIII, Tyrann Matheiu, Montee Ball, Andrew Luck, Trent Richardson. Mathieu was a game-changer like none other, despite not playing offense. Montee Ball had a slightly better season in total yards than Trent Richardson and happened to score 12 more TDs than him. Will he be a better NFL back? Who knows, but he was better this year.

Griffin had multiple Heisman moments this season, from the opening game all the way through the thrashing of Texas. The fact that he plays for Baylor doesn’t matter. If he doesn’t win, the Heisman means even less than I previously thought and we should probably start ignoring it.

--Tagged under: college football--

--Tagged under: text--

--Tagged under: wrapup--

by naternet November 27, 2011
So, That Happened 2011 - Week Thirteen

I give up. 

The #2 team in the BCS has been eliminated from it’s conference championship game. As has the #4 team in the BCS. The #3 team doesn’t even have to play in a conference title game. Meanwhile, the #1 team in the land has to play in their conference title game and win just to hold on to their ranking. 

How is this not a broken system? The conferences have title games, but getting to those games has no bearing whatsoever upon rankings, apparently. Alabama, who lost at home to LSU, could leapfrog the Tigers if LSU somehow loses to Georgia in the SEC title game. Even without that gift, the Tide has a good shot at playing in the national title game, despite being beaten at home and eliminated from their own conference title game. 

The fuck?

LSU is handicapped due to their excellence. They’re putting in jeopardy their #1 ranking for something that has no bearing whatsoever upon the BCS race. Stanford is ranked ahead of the team that eliminated them from contention for their conference title, Oregon.

None of this makes any sense. Nor is it fair. 

On the flipside, the Big East’s automatic qualifier for a BCS bowl may well be 7-5 Louisville. Meanwhile, 10-1 Boise State has to hope for an at-large bid.

This system is broken. It needs to be fixed. People across the college football landscape have been screaming this for years, but it’s even more true this year and it’s only going to get worse. 

With the 2011 season all over but the shouting (and there will be plenty of shouting), we have just a scant few games left for things to shake themselves out. But from my point of view, it’s been a disappointing, rough season marred by scandal, investigations, sub-par play, lack of parity, and likely a unsatisfying outcome. LSU/Bama rematch? Yeah, I’ll watch it, but I’m not going to enjoy it. 

Never the less, here are some things I learned this weekend.

  • Friday’s games are all a haze of leftover stuffing and pie. I’m not too convinced that I actually missed anything. 
  • Saturday’s rivalry games were almost all blowouts. What a way to end the season…
  • Michigan/Ohio State was actually worth watching. Who knew?
  • Notre Dame finally looks like they’ve made the switch to Andrew Hendrix at QB over Tommy Rees. Too bad they didn’t make that decision before they found themselves down 21-0…
  • The most intriguing game of the weekend happened while most of you were in a turkey-induced coma, with Texas A&M sticking to the script and collapsing in the second half.  Well done, guys.
  • We still have no idea who the Heisman frontrunner should be, but it looks like Andrew Luck, Trent Richardson and Robert Griffin III are locks to be invited to NYC in a few weeks. Montee Ball disapproves, but then again, he’s probably still scoring a TD somewhere…
  • I will be spending the next few weeks watching FCS playoffs, because I enjoy seeing moderately competent football, especially when the teams are actually playing for a real title instead of an imaginary one. Watch with me, won’t you?

--Tagged under: college football--

--Tagged under: text--

by naternet November 8, 2011
Paterno

One of my first vivid memories of college football is the Snow Bowl, the 1992 game at Notre Dame Stadium between the Irish and the Penn State Nittany Lions. At the time, my love for Notre Dame football was still in it’s infancy. I had only been watching college football for a few years, catching games here and there after Saturday morning cartoons were over.

The game was the weekend after my 13th birthday. I was officially a teenager. It was cold and snowing outside my parents’ house in northern Minnesota; one of those lazy winter Saturdays, perfect for cozying up with a good book, working on a jigsaw puzzle or settling in for some late-season college football.

The game was an epic struggle and as the snow fell heavier and heavier, my respect for the Nittany Lions grew, but I was still pulling for Notre Dame. With just four minutes left, Penn State scored and took the lead. Scoring had been at a minimum all afternoon and the chances that Notre Dame could come back were slim. But they did. A gutsy drive capped by a TD toss to Jerome Bettis and a 2pt conversion heave to Reggie Brooks solidified my love of the Irish. It was magic. 

I will never forgot the immense respect I found for the Penn State players and their venerable coach, Joe Paterno. The shot of him on the sidelines after Brooks’ amazing diving grab to give Notre Dame the lead (pictured above) epitomized the game of football for me. Just a shrug and a “damn…guess that’s how it goes” look on his face said so much. It reinforced that this was just a game, even with how large and important every play had seemed, it was just a game and there would be other games. Losing wasn’t the end of the world, especially when you lost with dignity and class.

So much of that is gone, now. So much of that dignity and class is lost.

The allegations against former Penn State player and coach Jerry Sandusky that came to light over this past weekend and Joe Paterno’s involvement (or lack thereof) sully him forever in the eyes of not just college football fans, but in the eyes of the world. He flat-out abdicated responsibility when informed of the perversions of Sandusky.

He did what he was legally required to, immediately informing the higher-ups at the university, but he failed to do what he morally should have once it was clear that the university was not going to take proper action. He didn’t call the police. He didn’t do everything he should have to ensure that Sandusky, a man whom he had known for over 50 years, didn’t abuse another young boy in a similar manner. 

Of course, all of the blame shouldn’t fall on JoePa’s shoulders. The Penn State administration failed more than once to take proper action after being informed of prior incidents involving Sandusky. By doing so, they enabled and sheltered an accused sex offender, despite numerous first-hand reports. One can only assume that they did so to save face and protect the university, instead of protecting the defenseless young boys that Sandusky is alleged to have abused. 

But as the face of the university for more than half a century, as a man who always stressed honor and accountability over everything else, Paterno should have done more. He was obligated because of his position to do more. That he didn’t do more mars his entire legacy. It calls into question how dedicated he truly was to honor and accountability. It shouldn’t, but it does. It just does. 

And it’s sad, in a way. Not nearly as sad as what is alleged to have happened to those poor boys, of course. But it tarnishes the past 60 years of college football. It tarnishes Penn State University as an institution. It tarnishes Penn State football and athletics. It tarnishes every single member of the Penn State administration and athletic department who knew and did nothing, who suspected and looked away, who saw Jerry Sandusky around the program for years after accusations were made and waved or said “hi,” who treated him with respect when they had reason to believe that he deserved none. 

It’s sad that a man who, let’s face it, is Penn State football. A man who owns so many records, who has made good, morally upright citizens out of the boys that he recruited into the Penn State program, is going to leave the game that he gave so much to in such a way.

Joe Paterno, in not making the proper moral decisions, made his bed and he has to lie in it. That’s the most disappointing part. This was a failure on the part of so many others, but it was also a failure of Joe Paterno to live up to the ideals that he stood for and instilled in so many young men. He failed to be the man that he encouraged them to be. He failed to be the person that he held himself up to be. To me, that’s incredibly sad. 

The only way to even come close to making things right is to burn it all down and start from scratch. Get rid of all the administrators even remotely connected to these incidents. Get rid of the entire football staff, especially Paterno and Mike McQueary, who as a grad assistant in 2002 witnessed Sandusky sexually assaulting a ten year old boy and yet stayed with the program to this day after nothing was done to Sandusky. How a person could know about or witness such a heinous act, see the institution do nothing about it and not only not take the matter to the authorities, but continue to work for that institution is beyond my mental capacity. I almost have more contempt for McQueary than I have for Paterno and Curley and the other members of the administration who did nothing.

The whole place needs to be scrubbed clean before all else. In fact, canceling the remainder of the season shouldn’t be out of the realm of possibility. No one should be cheering on a program that stood by while young boys were being abused. No one should cheer for Joe Paterno. No one should celebrate what will likely be his final game in Happy Valley this Saturday. It’s just not right. 

It’s just a game. What is a game compared to the lives ruined by the actions of Sandusky, Penn State and Paterno?

--Tagged under: college football--

--Tagged under: sandusky--

--Tagged under: penn state--

--Tagged under: paterno--

--Tagged under: text--

--Tagged under: abuse--

by naternet June 15, 2011
To Kickoff or Not to Kickoff, That is the Question

Rutgers head football coach Greg Schiano saw firsthand last year the potential for kickoffs to go horribly wrong when Scarlet Knights’ player Eric LeGrand was paralyzed while making a tackle on the kick coverage team. Recently, he’s made wave in the college football world by starting to advocate for a major rule change, the elimination of kickoffs from the game entirely. Georgia coach Mark Richt has just jumped on the bandwagon, as well. 

Schiano’s idea is to replace kickoffs with punts. The thinking being that on a punt, players don’t have a free 40-50 yard run toward the ballcarrier. That amount of space to build up a head of steam before slamming into blockers or the return man causes some of the most violent and uncontrollable collisions on the football field. True, that speed and chaos are part of what make kick returns one of the more exciting plays in the game, but that excitement comes with an inordinate amount of injury and violence. 

To replace onside kicks, Coach Schiano has suggested a scenario where the “kicking team” would have one offensive play, with the down and distance marked at 4th and 15. It’s not a finalized idea, just something he was throwing out there to replace the onside kick. But I think it’s a good start. 

Anyone who has ever played organized football knows that kickoffs are dangerous. When I was on the kick coverage team as a gunner, I loved it. I was 16 and thought I was invincible. I loved to run fast and hit people and that’s exactly what I was tasked with doing. But it got less and less fun after I hurt an opponent. I was running down and one of my teammates had wrapped the return man by the legs. He was still trying to hop out of the tackle when I hit him high. He folded to the ground and started screaming. When I looked down, his foot was right next to his hip. I don’t know the extent of his injury, but it looked gruesome. I remember thinking that, if it had just been a regular play from scrimmage, there was no way I would have been able to hit him that hard and there was no way he would have been in such a vulnerable position.

After that play, I kind of lost my zest for kick coverage. I still loved playing football and running around and hitting people, but there was always that voice in the back of my head, warning me not to come in so recklessly. I didn’t want to hurt someone that badly again. Maybe that makes me soft, I don’t know. I still laid people out from time to time, but not to that extent. 

So I think Schiano’s idea is a good one. On a punt, the gunners have a defender checking them the whole way down the field, so it’s harder for them to get a free run at the return man. Punt returns are just as exciting as kickoffs, with less of the career and life-threatening collisions.

Over one hundred years ago, formations like the flying wedge were banned and a series of rule changes were made to the game to make it safer. Those changes were made in response to increasing deaths on the field. I think it’s fair to say that, over the past 15-20 years, we’ve seen an increase in spinal and head injuries in the game. I just hope it doesn’t take a death on the field for rules committees to take action.

--Tagged under: football--

--Tagged under: injury--

--Tagged under: kickoffs--

--Tagged under: sports--

--Tagged under: text--

Theme created by: Roy David Farber and Hunson. Powered By: Tumblr...
1 of 1
-->